course
European Union: Policies and Institutions

Dec 2006

Professor Goodhart is a very engaging lecturer. She clearly loves the material, and the lectures are organized and very clear. Some of the readings are dry as dust, but she usually goes over the main points in lecture, so you don't necessarily have to read them.

Apr 2006

For material as dry and complicated as the EU, Lucy Goodhart does a good job. Her lectures are clear and organized and she is clearly fascinated by the material although her class might not be. The class gets more interesting after the midterm. Very accessible.

Jan 2006

Professor Goodhart is a good lecturer who cares deeply about the subject material. Overall, I enjoyed the class and found the material interesting and Prof. Goodhart engaging. The only problem I had with the class was that we repeated the same material several times throughout the semester. Workload: One short policy memo, one long (10-12 page) research paper, midterm, final

Jan 2006

Overall a great class. Yes, the grading is sometimes harsh (but not anymore so than other Poli Sci classes) and yes the theory is limited to about 4 major strands of ideas. However, for those who don't have a solid understanding of the EU and who are studying international politics this class is an absolute must. Moreover, those who said this is a history class neglect the fundamental element of political science (and this class). Goodhart places a strong emphasis on analysis, prediction and causality. Goodhart is funny and wonderfuly sarcastic. I read some of the reviews below. And yes, there were a few people who managed to sleep through the lectures. However, I would say these people (who asked horribly asinine questions) were the largest detraction from the class.

Dec 2005

This is a great class. Discusses the politics of the EU in depth. Goodhart is just amazing; she brings spunk and motivation to a topic that even european bureaucrats might have a tough time with. A+

Dec 2003

What's curious about the reviewers that propose that the class was a "disappointment" or a failure to address the theoretical aspects of the EU in the world system is that they fail to understand the class is named EU: "Politics and Institutions." So naturally it would follow that we would study the politics, and (gasp!) institutions. Not only is Prof Goodhart truly concerned with her students, as evidenced in her answering questions she couldn't answer in class by email (after researching and providing links), she is knowledgeable in a wholly complex subject. I would recommend taking this class if you want to escape from the Chalmersian drivel of "theory" that's nothing more than uninteresting, masturbatory polisci ping-pong conceptualization. She will make you realize that the Polisci department at Columbia actually teaches relevant, interesting material.

Dec 2003

Goodhart is a good lecturer and clearly in command of the material, but this course is in entirely the wrong department. For Poli Sci students, especially comparative poli sci students, looking for some insight into the broad theoretical questions raised by the EU, this is not the class. The entire course is spent rehearsing the history of the EU and grinding through the minutiae of its procedures - important information, no doubt, but of little interest to political science students. The course is taught as though it is an orientation session for bureaucrats desiring to learn the nuts and bolts of the system. At the beginning of the class, Goodhart pointed out that the EU is fascinating as a comparative study to the US and as a challenge to the nation-state. I couldn't agree more; these questions are exactly why I registered for the class. I only wish we had addressed them.

Nov 2003

I am completely astounded by some of these reviews. This class was the single worst class I have taken at Columbia and Goodhart the second or third worst professor. The material itself is painfully boring but it makes up for it by being incredibly convoluted and just plain dumb also. She makes token and generally symbolic efforts to answer students' questions and address their concerns but they are generally no more than that and she isn't successful at imparting any information in the first place. In my opinion, she's patronizing and her accent is annoying, her lectures are totally unclear and her grading is extremely difficult. She's one of those professors that will write "excellent paper, strong points, good arguement" and then give you a C. It doesn't make any sense and neither does taking this class. Avoid for the sake of your mental health.

Nov 2003

This is a wonderful class, the best I've ever taken, with a wonderful, knowledgeable and motivated professor. I can only recommend taking it.

Nov 2003

Professor Goodhart is a great professor and lecturer. Given the density of the material and the breadth & depth of knowledge that she must impart to us, she does a wonderful job with the lectures. She covers all of the material in a tight and cohesive manner, though I will warn you, there is a LOT of material to cover. The readers are fair but there is a lot to pick up from them. She assigns really interesting reading and points out the interesting parts during the lectures. You have to be really focused on her class; otherwise, it'll just go over your head. If you're at all interested in EU politics, take this class! Also, you will find that Goodhart, more than any other professor on campus, is amazingly friendly, approachable, patient, and generous with her time and energy outside the classroom.

Jan 2003

Prof. Goodhart is a sweet young lady who truly makes her students a top priority. The lecture material is interesting yet very detailed. She's a pretty tough grader, but she gives lots of comments to justify your grades. She's also willing to answer all questions, even if that requires doing some research on her part. And she's approachable over email in addition to during class. Overall, a good poli sci class to take. The readings are dense but not as boring as they are in some poli sci classes and not unnecessarily excessive, either in number or in length.

Dec 2002

Professor Goodhart does a good job of teaching a complicated, messy bunch of institutions and policies and still managed to make it interesting and, at times, funny. The lectures were well organized, carefully structured, and coherent. She provided her own lecture notes to us at the end of the semester to help us prepare for the final, and was always very approachable and friendly outside of class.

Nov 2002

Goodheart's lectures may be a bit dense at times, as well as slightly confusing (what with the masses of names and dates scrawled on the board) but that should not discourage one from taking this course. If Europe sounds interesting to you, take this. The readings, although extensive, may be supplemeted by the lectures (get it?). And although she may at times be complicated, outside of the classroom she is very understanding and nice, and goes out of her way to meet with students and listen intently to their questions and/or confusions/comlications.

Nov 2002

This class is simply boring. The readings are long and tedious, the lectures are no better. Goodheart articulates every sentence in this strange, yet entirely annoying, pompous voice, as if talking to a group of young children. Come midterm time you will have wished you instead opted for something different, while staring at her unorganized scribbles of dates and endless confrences, cursing your cruel fate. She is a tough grader, and has no worries about handing out C's, oblivious to Columbia's grade inflation policies. and will drown your poor mind in mindless detail above the EU. You can take this class, however, if you are ONE OF THOSE TYPES. And we all know WHO they are.