Megan is a really, really nice person and relatively accommodating with students, but as a teacher I have to say she was probably mediocre at best. I should probably preface this review with the acknowledgement that I did have a really awesome Lit Hum professor, and so coming into CC I probably had really high expectations of gaining a similarly phenomenal experience out of CC. That, unfortunately, was not the case - and at first I tried to put the blame on the fact that the texts in the first half of the semester (the religious texts, especially) weren't particularly exciting, and that there wasn't a whole lot of discussion to be mined out of those texts anyway. I chose to give Megan the benefit of the doubt - a CC class, after all, is only as productive and interesting as the discussions that the students themselves choose to have - but as the semester progressed it became increasingly apparent that she just wasn't a very good discussion leader or lecturer (though the class hardly consisted of her lecturing). Granted, the class I was in didn't really have too many enthusiastic or articulate students, but too often Megan would let some student ramble on for too long, or go off tangent into a really trivial and unessential detail about the texts we were discussing, without making any effort to rein in the discussion or redirect it. The result was that we often ended up having discussions about pointless and insignificant aspects of the texts, rather than discussing themes as a whole that were central to the text, and which we should have come away from each lesson with.
On that point, a significant deficiency of this class was the fact that I never felt like I came away from each lesson with an understanding of the key points and themes of each text. Oftentimes these points were only gleaned by myself in my own individual reading of the text before and after the class. I did get the sense that Megan probably had her own opinions and understandings of each text, but she never really expressed them, choosing to let the class' spiral into tangentially related frivolities (that also too often involved some member of the class either expostulating over-passionately about trivial details or attempting to make sub-standard arguments when he/she clearly hadn't done the reading). All in all, the quality of discussion in the class was really poor.
Megan also wasn't the most responsible of teachers - a lot of things were returned to us really late, save for our response papers. The midterm was returned to us significantly later than we might expect from most other classes, as were the our paper proposals with her comments and our papers themselves. Megan also didn't give very many constructive comments that might have helped to improve the quality of the critical thinking process. The review session for our final was conducted at V&T's - not the most conducive place for a quick condensation of over 30 very dense, ancient texts of Western civilization. I didn't feel like I came away from this class with any significant revelations on the foundations of Western civilization and religion, which is a shame because I did find many of the texts later in the semester to be extremely thought-provoking and interesting. I think I actually learnt more about Plato and Hobbes while having dinner with a friend (who is a philosophy major) at the end of the semester than I did from being in Megan's class. If you value your learning experience, and want to gain the most you can out of CC, I would stay away from her section. Otherwise, she is a very pleasant, easy-going teacher, from whom it is probably not extremely hard to get an A, albeit without learning very much.