Making the Metropolis

May 2012

Professor Smiley's class is pretty interesting -- I was a non-major taking the class for fun, and his lectures sort of inspired me to further pursue Urban Studies as a major. I think this was more due to interesting content than his lecturing in general, but I digress. Some lectures are really great (I love the City Beautiful movement section) and some of them are really boring and hard to follow (the last few lectures on theory became tumblr time for most people). Smiley doesn't do such a great job of putting the architectural projects into context. I didn't know the background on most of the projects and had to look it up after class (which made the take-home exams extra tricky). However, he speaks very beautifully -- he has a way of phrasing ideas that's just nice to listen to, and thought-provoking. In general, the class is alright. Would recommend to a friend. But not life-changing by any means.

Nov 2009

I find Professor Smiley to be a really friendly guy. Sometimes I find myself getting a little sleepy in class, but I think that is mostly reflective of the fact that the class room is always dark (so that slides are visible). All the lectures are a series of slides, some of which show really fascinating perspectives of architecture. Heavy focus on Le Corbusier and Garden City/City Beautiful stuff. I was sad that Robert Moses and Jane Jacobs only got like 10 minutes of lecture time during the whole semester. Professor Smiley will always pause to take questions in class, but I found that people didn't ask questions very often. I guess my only major complaint about this class is that context is almost never provided. We looked only at the projects themselves and rarely at the what was happening in the social/political worlds at this time that influenced those projects.