professor
Jeffrey Wayno

Mar 2021

Jeffrey (he insists that "unless our need for the social hierarchy is that strong" to call him Jeffrey) is an AMAZING professor. I had him during a semester when everything was on Zoom, but he was incredibly understanding and engaging even with a technological barrier. As a person, he is very kind and open-minded to all forms of interpretation of the texts. He gave veryyy detailed feedback and was always inviting us to office hours if we wanted to go over papers. However, he usually didn't read drafts of papers before we turned them in (which I know some professors allow). His job is in the Union Theological Seminary, and he curates medieval texts, which in a normal year he would show to his students. I definitely recommend his class!

Dec 2020

I took Lit/Hum with Jeffrey (what he wanted us to call him) during the Fall 2020 semester completely on Zoom. Unfortunately, he did not stay as my professor through the Spring, but I cannot recommend his class enough. I am by no means a fan of literature and ancient texts, but Jeffrey made every class a delight and never let the conversation go stale. He is not only great at leading the discussions, but he is a very understanding professor and very quick to respond by email. He takes a bit to grade papers, but that is because he provides unparalleled feedback which is incredibly helpful and productive. If you get the chance, you should take a class with Jeffrey.

Apr 2015

Jeffrey was a fantastic teacher. This review will undoubtedly get some downvotes as I know of some people who disagree with me (and they are probably the most likely to come to review on CULPA), but I know of some others who agree with me on this as well. I came into LitHum dreading it and thinking it would be the most painful class I’d take at Columbia. I end the class grateful that it was required and having learned more than I ever expected. This is largely a function of the incredible literature that we read, but is also reflective of Jeffrey’s teaching. When I saw that Jeffrey was a Grad student (and in the History Department) I was pretty disappointed that my longest class wouldn’t be taught by an expert. But honestly, if anything his being a Grad student was a plus. He was never overbearing in his knowledge of the books or the historical context and was open to any ideas the students had, while still guiding the discussions in a way that helped you look at the books differently. This was especially important given that the amount of reading in LitHum was (at least for me) very overwhelming – I had to skip a lot of the readings and skim even more. While some of our discussions were less interesting than others (Medea basically devolved into a feminist dispute; we had a baffling conversation on the semantics of “power” vs. “authority” in King Lear, which I am convinced are effectively the same word; and an odd discussion of the effects of the Napoleonic War on Pride and Prejudice), the majority of the discussions were very interesting. We had some especially great discussions about Don Quixote, Crime and Punishment, and To the Lighthouse at the end of the year. All said and done, Jeffrey was a very intelligent, fair, and attentive teacher, in addition to being the nicest guy in the world. He always listened to everyone’s opinion and guided the discussion skillfully without ever being condescending. He had an awesome tendency to respond to emails within minutes (always with his signature sign-off “Cheers”) and was readily available to meet, during or outside of Office Hours. Tl;dr Jeffrey may not be a tenured professor but he has the exact qualities you want for a class like this. Taking this class made me more appreciative of the Core (barf, that’s something I thought I’d never say) and definitely of the literature.