Sanjay Reddy

This professor has earned a CULPA silver nugget

Dec 2008

Professor Reddy is a wonderful professor and a wonderful man. First, you can tell he REALLY cares about his students and is genuinely interested in hearing their points of view. Even in a large lecture class, he encourages class participation, and truly listens to every student's comments. I felt completely comfortable commenting on sometimes very complex economic theories, which is a truly rare thing for a Columbia or Barnard econ class. I found the material to be absolutely fascinating. When people say Development Economics, it can mean a lot of different things. Professor Reddy understands this, and in facts structures his class around the idea that development economics has been interpreted in many different ways throughout the 20th century until today. Each week focuses on a different theory or aspect of economic development - from the Solow growth model to the role of gender, health, and education in economic development. In many ways, this is a history of economic development class. I left feeling I knew a good amount about many different thoughts and theories in the field, rather than harping on one. He is not a data-driven economists, but a theoretical economist. There are no problem sets or equations to memorize. He occasionally used formulas or equations when relevant, but it was absolutely NOT necessary to follow them if you don't like that kind of thing. Being taught by a theoretical economist, who emphasizes the all economists have are THEORIES and not canonical doctrines and laws, was incredibly refreshing. Every economics major should absolutely take this class, and I also recommend it to anyone else with an interest in development work and poverty.

Jan 2008

I have mixed feelings about this class, because at times I enjoyed the theories being discussed and at others I wanted to smash my head in boredom. Reddy is a sweet man, but is definitely not concise. When he speaks in lectures it's like he's reading from a wordy dissertation he wrote, and its hard to follow him at times. There are no books to purchase for this class--all the readings were available online. However, the amount of reading he assigns each week is completely unmanageable. He touches upon some readings more than others, but he ignores some completely. You can probably get by without doing most of the reading at all. I got an A- in the class and I stopped reading anything after the midterm. That said, there were plenty of people in the class that were truly interested in the material, and the questions they raised made the class more interesting. Reddy tries to accommodate the students interests (he brought in a guest lecturer because we were more interested in topics on NYC) and he also grades extremely generously and will weigh the final more if you do poorly on the midterm. Take this class if you're really interested in inequality or poverty, or if you want a fairly easy A in an economics elective.

Oct 2007

I LOVED this class and Professor Reddy is BY FAR one of the best professors I have ever encountered at Columbia. He is SO SWEET and you can tell that he really cares about his students. Professor Reddy is an extremely good lecturer and very eloquent. The good thing about this class is that it puts economics in to many different contexts like sociology and anthropology so you don't just have to be an econ major to enjoy this class. I HIGHLY recommend this class to ANYONE, whether they are interested in economics or not. Professor Reddy is amazing.

Jan 2004

An excellent class. Well-structured and a superb lecturer. Very eloquent and easy to follow and covers most of the readings. Very approchable and is just brilliant!

Jan 2004

Sanjay Reddy is such a sweet man; I took this course without any prereqs and I had very little interest in econ itself (I was more drawn to the development aspects of it). So I decided to take the risk and do a 25 page paper on women and dev and that was probably yhe best decision I ever made. It's really not that bad..I would say ditch the midterm/final and do something else that may strike your as well as his interest.

Aug 2003

class drags by so incredibly slowly with him. BUT he is so incredibly nice and personable. he's ALSO nice with the grades. if you show improvement over time, he'll give you the benefit of the doubt and curve it. in addition, he curves the tests anyways. so it's doublely nice. the only prob is the telephone thickeness of his combined readings... there;s few books to buy. but it's alot of dense material. he's always up for suggestions on ways to grade you... if you want to avoid a final... he has mentioned that previous students did extensive interviews and etc for papers.. or you could do a regular paper

Jul 2003

The class is likely to receive mixed reviews, because I myself have mixed feelings about it. The class itself digresses vastly from other econ classes, since we do not analyze as many graphs, equations, etc. There is tons of reading that can be regarded as highly theoretical as well. You need very little from the intermediate macro and micro classes to follow this class. You just simply have to read. It is true that Professor Reddy's voice is very monotous, but his lectures are excellent and they are a perfect summary of all the readings. He definitely shows consideration for his students, deliberately asking questions or opinions to reach out to his large class. However, the class is still very impersonal.

Mar 2002

The absolute BEST class I've taken at Columbia. Professor Reddy is, without a doubt, an unbelievably articulate and fascinating lecturer and an absolutely brilliant man. His lecturers couldn't be further from "boring" or "monotonous." His genuine passion for the topic at hand come across loud and clear and the time spent in class absolutely flies by. The topics he selected for exploration were truly interesting and timely and were drawn from a variety of disciplines including philosophy, sociology, and of course, economics. Anyone who bothered to put a little effort into attending class and listening to his lectures came away with a very strong foundation in looking at the question of inequality and poverty in this country and abroad. Both lectures and assesments definitely are biased toward the qualitative, rather than quantitative, side. So this is an ideal class for those of us who want to go beyond endless graphs and confusing superscripts. He is very responsive to suggestions and made a real effort to alter the course so as to accomodate student feedback.

Feb 2002

I completely disagree with the earlier review. This professor is truly brilliant and superbly articulate. He respects students' intelligence --- for a change -- and offers a genuinely interdisciplinary view of the subject, going well beyond the issues considered in most economics classes, without sacrificing economic expertise. I highly recommend him. And by the way, why are almost all of the reviews on this list so totally negative?

Jan 2002

This class was just awful. The professor is horrible! He is boring, his voice is monotonous, he speaks way too fast so you cannot write down the important stuff, and has the most annoying smirk on his face the whole class. I must admit he did make an effort to improve his lectures, but I don't think anything will help him. Unless you are really interested in the topic of development economics, stick with other econ classes and professors.