Lawrence Engel

This professor has earned a CULPA silver nugget

Nov 2006

The school is lucky to have Larry. He is one of the few teachers in his field that actually knows what he is doing, and that it works in the REAL WORLD. He is a producer, cinematographer, director, and screenwriter all in one. If you look him up on IMDB he has a real repertoire unlike the other people in the film department who are floating around in academic-la-la-land. Larry may be a bit harsh, he might talk too much and too loud, he might be really busy outside of class (he has a job outside of Columbia) but he is the real deal. He always makes time for his students and always replies to e-mail asap. He cares immenseley about his students and about well-made movies in general.

Jan 2005

Prof. Engel did a great job designing this course. It gives a broad overview of the history of documentary, from the Lumiere Brothers to Errol Morris. Every film was extremely education or enjoyable, and most of the selections were both. Class discussion wasn't the course's strong point, but Larry's lectures were insightful and usually very relevant to the current state of documentary. Class-time was nicely balanced between screenings and discussion, and the films themselves represented an incredibly broad range of topics and styles.

Dec 2004

Incredible? I wanted to die. This class was 4 hours of hell. Coffee wasn't enough to ward off a headache. Prof. Engel is a genuinely nice, low-key guy, but is definitely more of a filmmaker than a teacher. There were no lectures unless you count a couple of hours when he threw an outline of his mentor's book on the overhead and read it to us without really explaining it. And the day when he tried to get us into a discussion about propaganda but succeeded only in coaxing out some ridiculously inane, uninsighful comments. The insights he called out during films were usually "low angle," "high angle," or "continuity cut." He never brought up current documentaries (to be fair, I don't think many people in the class actually saw or had any interest in current documentaries, unless you count Fahrenheit 9/11, which they constantly brought up as if that made them well-versed) and he didn't give us any insight into where he thought documentaries were going in the future. The level of discussion/"lecture" was completely superficial and I felt stupid even sitting there. I'm not a film major so I don't know if this is what all film classes are like, but it was not challenging at all. Save yourself some time and rent some Wiseman and Maysles. Sitting through this class is just pointless.

Jul 2004

Not a fan of this class. I took this class hoping for, well, an introduction to the study and theory of film. Instead, I got a bunch of film snobbery wedged between movies that were extremely hit or miss (and occasionally a 3 hr 45 min nap). These movies are not all appropriate to an intro class, but we watch them because Larry wants our generation to see them (he tells you this on the first day of class). I want to be a film major, and I couldn't stand the other film majors in the class. Larry caters to the 3% that already know everything you're supposed to learn, and calls on the same 4 kids as they snicker over the absurdity anachronistic mis en scene! hahaa! The class is just really impersonal and NOT a good introduction to the film dept. Discussion sections are hit or miss, but mine was actually awesome, thanks to Daniel Falcone (loved him!).

May 2004

What an amazing class. Professor Engel, by far, taught the best class I had all year. Provided, I am a film major, but I think my love for the class stands far beyond my love of film. Essentially, Larry is extremely passionate about cinema and it shows during the screenings. Although he does talk over the films, he chooses times with very little action and usually adds quite a bit to the impact of the film. From day one, Larry hopes that he'll change the way you see film and I can faithfully say that by the last class, he certainly accomplishes that goal. As other reviewers have stated, it's the TAs and not Prof. Engel that grades your work, so getting a bad TA can be deadly - then again that can happen in your other classes as well. If you're not interested in majoring in film, then just Pass-Fail the class - if you are, then just be sure to follow up with your TA and let him or her know about your interest in cinema. Going to class every day was a pleasure unmatched by the rest of my schedule.

May 2004

Larry Engel is a professor with great potential who somehow insists on being boring. He doesn't really "teach" so much as he projects movies and draws out a cliche' or two before and after the films, drawn straight out of the readings. However, in the one or two instances when he does analyze a scene he has his moments of brilliance - unfortunately, these moments were rare. The class is not hard, the reading is vastly doable, and sitting in a room every week watching movies (most of which are great, except for his odd choice of the bride of frankenstein) can barely be considered a torture. Even if you are taking the class for kicks and do not intend to be a film major, you can easily both have fun and get an A. The man has an obsession with Alain Resnais. When I took his class, he used three Alain Resnais movies as the "main movie" for the French New Wave class, the Experimentalist/Avantguard film class and the Documentary Class. While Resnais is a highly eminent director, his work can hardly be considered "emblematic" for each of those three movements/traditions ... so at the end of the semester, do yourself a favour and watch more films to get a broader picture of the New Wave and Experimentalist film. Basically: Fun Class because of the Material, but a Passive and Mediocre Professor

Jan 2004

I agree with most of the positive reviews below. I want to add that I took this course to fulfill a general requirement and I am in no way a film major and knew nothing about film prior to the course, and I loved it. You can pick and choose what to take away from this course. For my midterm and finals I was able to analyze the films as literature, or socially or politically, and I didn't need to learn much about camera angles or lighting or the Deconstructor or any of that weird stuff that only Film majors like. (Though I could have learned this stuff if I had wanted to, simply by not zoning out when he talked about it during class.) Don't be scared away from this course if you're not a Film major! Beware, though, of falling asleep during the movies. They're all very good and interesting, but it's a dark room, and if you're already tired... let's just say you should bring a caffienated beverage to class...

Jan 2004

Incredible course, incredible instructor. He changed my perspective on film, tv, and life in general to some extent. He had many fascinating stories about his adventures filming for the discovery channel and others. He also seemed to really care about the philosophical issues of film as art. He asked really thought provoking questions and showed, for the most part, very interesting films.

Jan 2004

Everyone should take this class with Larry regardless of whether one is a film major or not because you learn so much about the nature of media and film. When I registered for this class I originally planned to drop it because I didn't have room in my schedule, but after attending the first lecture (I hesitate to use that term because he encourages so much discussion in class), I was hooked. I learned more in the first class about filmmaking than I learned in some of my other classes all year. While it may not be your cup of tea when Larry speaks over the film and points out the filmmakersÂ’ decisions, I found it to be a very effective method of teaching. Larry does a great job of choosing films to show that demonstrate the different styles of documentary and gears much of the class toward examining how we differentiate between fiction and nonfiction film. He is extraordinarily personable and I particularly enjoyed his tales of real life experiences he has had while filming. Larry is very honest with his students, respects them, and lets them know what he really thinks. He can sometimes be cynical about the nature of film and people, but ultimately it comes across that he loves this visual medium. The first class, Larry started by pointing a camera at us and projecting the image on the board. He then asked rhetorically why we were all watching him lecture on screen instead of in person. Larry explained we love to have the story told for us and when a camera frames the shot it tells the story. This was a perfect Larry-ism, a sort of statement that really got you thinking about the nature of film. While I recommend any class that Larry teaches, I donÂ’t think I would have had as good a time in the intro to film class with him because it has a more specific intent and syllabus of theory to convey. LarryÂ’s great when he has more freedom to teach what he wants. Ultimately, a great experience with a great and wonderfully laid back teacher.

Dec 2003

Larry's quite a character... quirky, opinionated as anything, but pretty cool. If you're anything like me, you'll find the first half of the class pretty dry, with all the silent films and such. (Larry will sit in the theater and cry out things like, "Brilliant!" at seemingly random bits that clearly aren't random but brilliant.) However, the second half of the class-- films like "Primary," "High School," and "The Thin Blue Line"-- will really stay with you. Film discussion sections are fun and helpful sometimes when it comes to understanding the readings but more often than not, it's just about batting around opinions about the films and ideas for films for a half hour. (This is not a production class, but many of us made documentaries for the final project.) My T.A. Suzi is the most incredible girl-- funny, helpful, and cool. Try to end up in her discussion group if you can. So yes, I'd recommend this class if only for the awesome films you watch second half of the semester. Yes.

Aug 2003

Larry is so passionate about film, about documentaries, about his work, and about the class. The films are great, the discussions are good when he gets to expound on different ideas, and Larry is very personable and approachable. TA's definitely decide your grades so watch out for that. Otherwise, class is awesome and Larry is a very talented director/producer and professor.

Dec 2002

This is NOT an introductory film class. If you are looking for in intro to film class you should be taking American Film History 1930-1960. This is a theory class but for some reason gets the lowest course number. It is very hard and should only be endured if necessary for you major. Professor Engel has an interesting perspective. He is certainly pessimistic but since you almost certainly will not agree with him it will only broaden your knowledge. You must do the readings before the class for which they are assigned, especially the Cook book. He expects you to know that information very well and will not allow you to use it on tests. Instead he will expect you to have a moderate understanding of the theorists who will be utterly incomprehensible without a basic knowledge of film history which you will get from the Cook book. The primary book for the course is Film Theory and Criticism.

Dec 2002

Disclaimer: You should only take this class if you want to be a film major. Larry, the professor, announces this the first few days of class, and it is entirely true. This is not neccessarily a hard elective, but you will look at films in new and powerful ways. Anyone should appreciate the amount you learn in this class, but only other film majors who took it with me actually did. This is essentially Film Hum. Upon entering the class, persevere through the initial "go away" classes where Larry tells everyone to leave because you're going to hate it. Stay in class and learn to see films in a new way. I came to Columbia College as an incredibly well (privately) artistically educated student as I ran my high school's Art club and Film Forum that nearly, solely showcased experimental films. Most of my friends and family told me that I was way, way, way too critical of films. I knew movies like Minority Report, Annie Hall, and others were terrible trash. In Larry, I found a kindred spirit who made me even more critical and analytical of films. Instead of just critiquing and analyzing films in terms of individual images and narrative content, we learned how to analyze films at their unique core: sequences of moving images. The lectures and the readings skim over film history and mainly focus on cinematic techniques and theory. Every lecture is a new discovery, and Larry brings a wonderfully and sorely needed critical perspective to these films. With the possible exception of nouvelle vague films, he is never entirely complementary or critical of a certain film genre or film. He realizes early films have problems but that they also display their potential and the basics of filmic techniques. He acknowledges certain films that are brilliantly constructed and gives those due credit. As he intertwines his lectures with film theory, the class and film showings generally follow the outline of film history from Lumiere to Godard. Although he is out of town quite a bit, he and the T.A.'s are always responsive to questions and helpful with any problems. Larry and the T.A.'s even invite the entire class to Nacho Mama's several times throughout the semester! Last but certainly not least is the Deconstructor. An incredibly invaluable and underrated tool, the Deconstructor allows students to "deconstruct" film scenes shot by shot and analyze them through various cinematic qualities. Do not listen to those who say this is like science or math. Film students have been analyzing films shot by shot ever since the early 20th century days of the Russian film school. With the Deconstructor, students take part in this grand tradition in an accessible and painless manner. The people who say the Deconstructor reveals nothing about film say that literary devices reveal nothing about literature, that music keys and theory reveal nothing about music, and that semiology as well as artistic theory reveal nothing about the visual arts. Sometimes a piece of art is just a piece of art, and sometimes a piece of art has an underlying grammer or theory that unlocks untold ideas. In Larry's class, you unlock those ideas. My only qualm with the class is that only two lectures are dedicated to experimental and documentary films. DO NOT MISS THESE LAST TWO CLASSES!!!! Stay at Columbia for Thanksgiving and hand in your paper late because they are amazing. If you want to take a class in which you will learn and have fun, take Intro. to Film with Larry. EXCELLENT JOURNEY!!!!

Nov 2002

I came to Columbia University with the intention of majoring in film. Alas, I took the Intro to Film course taught by Larry Engel. Dare I say this was the worst experience of my life. He rambles for hours, especially when he has a new made-for-TV movie in the works. He has the ability to ruin the most touching and affecting scenes with his stream-of-consciousness commentary. Additionally, Larry hates everything. He is one of those igonorant intellectualls who believes that old is good. This is coming from a man who claims to never go to the movies anymore. He will lull you to sleep with his stories and self-aggrandizing anecdotes. Stay Away. Stay Far Away. Not only his teaching style is bad, you will learn nothing about the history of the movies, and his lectures on the meaning of films are completely vague and superficial. If you want to get anything out of the class you must do the reading. And there is a lot of it. He teaches movies as if it were math. You will actually have to graph scenes of movies, and analyze them in an essay. Depending on your TA, the discussion sections vary in quality. HATE is the only word that can describe my feeling. If you are interested in Film Studies, take the course offered through the English department at Barnard.

Nov 2002

This is the second worst class I have ever taken. The only redeeming quality of the class was that half of the films he showed in class (when he wasn't shouting over them) were pretty good. Larry is an accomplished documentary filmmaker. He obviously isn't doing that well or he wouldn't be "teaching." He ruins movies. He ignores narrative in exchange for analyzing the "syntax" and "grammar" of film. It's crap. He had a teacher when he went to Columbia named Stefan Sharff. This man is the basis for his entire spectrum of ideas on film. Engel doesn't have a creative thread in his body. In my opinion, he rips off Sharff's book in class all the time. He assigns tons of reading and gives the worst essay questions for exams ever. I feel so bad for anyone who takes this class after this semester because they will have to depend even more on this horrible film analysis tool called the Deconstructor. This crappy tool takes apart movies and analyzes them based on a number of pathetic aspects that really are just a figment of Larry's imagination. Basically, this class sucks. I was going to be a film major until I took it. Now I am going to major in Biology because at least I won't ever have to deal with Larry Engel again.

Dec 2001

The pessimist sees a disaster of a class where the projection equiptment always breaks, all the undergrad grading is done by silly TA's, the the syllabus seems to have no rhyme or reason, and the professor is overwhelmingly arrogant with his impromptu in-class discussions and long lectures on his personal life and career. The optimist sees that rarest of rarities-- a film department class that makes you think. Engel is smart and thinks about how he thinks about film, and some of his off-the-cuff lectures were great. Particularily his discussion of media coverage of Sept. 11 revealed an intelligence and perspective that most of us were totally uncapable of two days later. The class structure was a mess, I got no sense of the history, and I often felt that I would have been better off just showing up and auditing four or five times that semester. But still, it made me think, and if you're gonna be a lame-ass film major that might be a change of pace.

Jan 2000

Like many courses in the Film department the titles don't always jive with the subject matter. There is no Analysis of Film Language I. Regardless, if you want to make films, forget all the other courses and take this one (II). Save your money, and major in someting else. Engel's course is the only one you'll need to understand film. Engel teaches you how to read a film. Like a surgeon he takes each film and clinically dissects it, then he shows you how each one works. (You get none of the pointless high-falutin hot air that Sarris so ceremoniously delivers from his Learish throne.) But Engel, on the other hand, is like Moses taking you to the mountain. You learn what the biblical phrase "I was once blind, but now I can see," means. I was lucky when I took the course; it was small and there wasn't another vapid grad student to suffer in the endless rounds of section meetings.

Jan 2000

Some like him, others don't. He tends to ramble a lot. Slightly arrogant. He assigns an extreme amount of reading, but by the end of the semester, he even stops reading it. Midterm and Final are both take home. Much of how much you like this course depends on your TA.